![]() |
| My great-grandfather, William James Spiller (born Ireland c1856, died Melbourne 1933) |
A few thoughts on my discoveries when doing genealogy, or on genealogy events I have attended
Wednesday, May 8, 2013
Tuesday, May 7, 2013
My Brick wall solution
Inspired by James Tanner's recent blogs posts about Brick
Walls, I thought I'd put together a couple of posts on the subject. In this
first one I want to tell you one method I use to break down a brick wall. I do nothing.
Well, to be more specific, I wait. Let me explain how this works.
The first family I got interested in tracing were the
Highett family. My grandmother, Dorothy
Voila Highett, was born in Melbourne in 1901.
She knew a bit about the Highetts (even though she had been bought up by
her maternal grandparents, the Alway family), and the stories she told were
what got me interested in family history.
It was very easy to trace back to her great-grandfather, John Highett,
who arrived in Van Diemen's Land (as Tasmania was then called) in 1830 in company
with his brother, William. Skipping over
their time in VDL, John moved to what is now called Victoria in 1836 – just one
year after the first settlement of Melbourne. You don't have to do a great deal
when you arrive that early to make it into the history books, and it really
helps when your brother William, who came over to Melbourne from VDL in 1838,
became the first manager of the Union Bank in Victoria and a general pillar of
the community. This means that William
and John got an entry in the Australian Dictionary of Biography. The family also got an entry in Burke's
Colonial Gentry. Both of these sources
said that William and John were born at Weymouth in Dorset in 1807 and 1810
respectively. Back in the pre-internet
days I went to the Dorset County Records office to find their baptisms. The ONLY entry for anyone named Highett in
the registers was for the baptism of John son of Joseph and Elizabeth Highett
on 27 Sep 1809 in Melcombe Regis. Joseph
and Elizabeth (maiden name Harding) match the known names of John and William's
parents, but the 1809 date doesn't match.
And there are NO baptisms of any of the other siblings of John and
William, or anything relating to Joseph (baptism, marriage, etc). The latter
didn't worry me, as Burke's said that Joseph was born at Rodmede in Wiltshire,
and Melcombe Regis didn't worry me as it is one of the parishes in Weymouth. But I was still left me with two
interpretations for the lack of other Highett baptisms: either the 1810 date
for John's birth was wrong and heavens knows where everyone else was baptised,
or there were two sons named John and this one baptised in 1809 was baptised in
a hurry because he was sickly and subsequently died, and all other children of
Joseph & Elizabeth were taken back to their home town of Rodmede to be baptised,
including a second John in 1810. The problem was I could (at that time) find no
reference to the Highetts in Rodmede either.
![]() |
| William Highett (sadly, I have no picture of John) |
Now Highett is obviously not a common name, so I looked for
other people of that name in the IGI (as it was then) and found a smattering of
them, but lots of them in Burbage in Wiltshire. Purely because the name was so
rare I recorded everything I could find about the Burbage Highetts, and also posted
my interest in the descendants of Joseph Highett and Elizabeth Harding on
various mailing lists. After that I could proceed no further.
Time passed. I
focused on other families instead.
Then one day I got an email from someone who had been
researching the Harding family. Not only had Joseph married Elizabeth Harding,
but Joseph's sister Hannah had married Elizabeth's brother, William
Harding. I hadn't known about any of
Joseph's siblings. William and Hannah had no children of their own, but had
their niece, Sarah Highett, living with them who was mentioned in their wills,
along with Joseph Highett (stipulated as being the brother-in-law of William
Harding), Elizabeth Highett nee Harding and lots of other members of the
Highett family. I went back and checked the Burbage Highetts, and the families seemed
to match. Further checking of wills,
land transactions etc convinced me I had the right connection. Rodmede had been
a red herring. I eventually found that
Joseph's father was living in Rodmead (note the different spelling) at the time
of his death, but had been born and baptised in Burbage, as were all his
children. I could now proceed to trace
the Highett family back further.
The moral of the story is to post your interests in mailing
lists, or blogs, or any where that will "stick around" and can be
found in a Google search, and you may one day make contact with someone who
will have the information to help you break down your brick wall.
By the way, I never have found a baptism for William or a
1810 baptism for John. Two of their
sisters Sarah (born 1812) and Mary (born 1817) where not baptised until 1822
(in Middle Chinnock, Somerset), so perhaps Joseph & Elizabeth just didn't
feel any compulsion to get their children baptised.
Thursday, May 2, 2013
Book Review - Paul Bushell: Second Fleeter
I recently read a fascinating book about the early years of the Hawkesbury River settlements. It is called Paul Bushell: Second Fleeter, by Louise Wilson. I have absolutely no connection to the Bushell family, but I do have Hawkesbury ancestors. This book gave a terrific sense of the history of this area, as seen through the eyes of and effects on one family. This is always important, as it is vital to place our ancestors in the social, economic and political climate of the times in which they lived.
Amongst other things I learnt, while reading this book, about the difference between burglary and housebreaking. The former happens at night, when people were likely to be sleeping in the house. It is therefore a more serious crime than housebreaking.
In this book Louise Wilson uses (amoungst other things) land transactions and similar records to show how Bushell's holdings grew over time, and manages to identify where they were likely to have been living at any point in time. This is a great example of something that all family historians should look at, but rarely do. Land records in general are a little understood and largely ignored resource. This is a pity, as they can in some cases contain real gold mines.
This book also contains frequent references to other Hawkesbury people. Again, the people who live in the same community as our ancestors may have had an impact on their lives and should not be ignored.
This book has been written in a style that makes for easy reading. Each chapter covers an aspect of the Bushell family's lives ora period of their lives. There are plenty of illustrations and maps (though there is no list of illustrations).
I recommend this book to anyone interested in the early history of the Hawkesbury area.
Louise's web page gives details of how to purchase the book.
Thursday, April 25, 2013
Piper James Watt
I wrote about my grandfather, William Spiller (my mother's
father), and his experiences during WWI in a previous blog post. This time I thought I would write
about someone on my father's side. Dad's
father did not serve in WWI, but the husband of one of Dad's Aunts did (though
they were not married at that time), so it is him I am going to write about
this time.
James Watt was born on 7 Jun 1884 in Newmains, Lanarkshire
to William Watt and Jessie, nee Forrest. He joined the Glasgow Police in 1907 and
was awarded the Carnegie Medal for Bravery. He migrated to Australia sometime between
1910 and 1914 (his arrival has not been found) and joined the NSW Police Force.
Shortly after the outbreak of WWI, on 2 Sep 1914, he enlisted
at Randwick in the 4th Battalion AIF and was given the rank of
Piper. On 20 Oct 1914 he embarked on
HMAT Euripides for the conflict as part of the first detachment of the Australian and New Zealand Imperial Expeditionary
Forces.
HMAT Euripides
James Watt was amongst those who made the first dawn landings
at Gallipoli. A newspaper report in 2005
written by his daughter-in-law contains the following:
"Soon after the battalion was struggling up the hill
with 300 rounds of ammunition, iron rations, etc, and Watt, who was hanging on
to his bagpipes, was asked to stay behind for a while to take care of the
packs. This was no good to him; he was
with the boys a few minutes later, bagpipes and all, and his pipe in his
mouth."
He received a gunshot wound in the neck and shoulder, serious
enough to result in him being discharged and sent back to Australia. His military service records are confused on
the date this occurred, but it appears to have been in May 1915.
The newspaper report mentioned above says that when he
returned to Australia he was considered unfit for duties as a serving policeman,
and so he was employed on light duties in the Central Court from 1916 until his
death.
But on 3 Oct 1917, when he married May Brockbank at the
Central Methodist Mission in Sydney, he gave his occupation as police officer.
They moved to Lithgow, where May's family lived, and that was where their first
child was born. Two undated pension
applications by James Watt which are included in his service record give
addresses of "Police Dept, Bourke St., Redfern" and "Police
Stn., Lithgow". By 1923 at the
latest they were back living in Sydney, and it is probably from that time that
he worked at the Central Court.
The injury he had received at Gallipoli eventually resulted
in his death on 11 Sep 1932. The medical
officers had been unable to remove the bullet that had caused his injury
The cause on his death certificate was "Cerebral
Haemorrhage lasting 2 hours", and it is considered to be related to his
wound at Gallipoli, so his widow received a war widow's pension until her death
in 1981.
Thursday, March 28, 2013
Final thoughts on Rootstech 2013
Rootstech has become a victim of its own success. The number of attendees was well out of
kilter with the sizes of the rooms available. Several times the sessions I
wanted to go to were full, with standing room only. On one occasion I managed to get into a
popular session by arriving 15 minutes before it was due to start. Already the room was nearly full. I had to climb over many people to get to a
seat, as they really packed the seats into the room. This is a real problem
with the people who are bringing along trundle bags with their coats, packed
lunches and whatever else they feel they can’t do without. Organisers
please note: we need more leg room between the rows of seats.
Trying to leave sessions that were in one of the 155 or 255
rooms was a nightmare, as people were queuing to get into the next session, so
no one could get through the foyer area to either join another queue or go
somewhere else. There also seemed to be
an issue that some sessions overran slightly, delaying the exodus from that
room and the subsequent filling of it for the next session. Organisers please note: Having attendees pre-register a preference for
which sessions they wish to attend can help you work out whether to schedule
that talk in a 50-seat room, a 200-seat room, the main hall, or whatever. This has worked well at other conferences I
have attended. It doesn't mean people
have to attend the sessions they originally put their names down for, but it
helps gauge the level of attendance likely at each talk. The other option some conferences use it to schedule
some of the popular talks to run more than once.
On the first day, the Thursday, the main hall and the
smaller rooms were so overheated (especially with all the bodies in them) that
on one occasion it made me feel quite ill and faint, and I had to leave half
way through the session – not easy to do when I had to clamber over many people
to get out of my seat – a go back to my room for a break. Thankfully it was better the other two days,
so the problem had obviously been reported and addressed. Organisers
please note: Thank you for lowering the temperature for days two and three.
Enough has already been said about the problems with the
Wi-Fi internet access, so I will not comment further.
This all sounds rather negative, and I don't feel that way
about the conference at all. I merely
see these things I have raised as areas where improvement is possible. I think that the organization was superb, and
almost everything went very smoothly – a big achievement with 6700
pre-registered attendees and another 1900 students on the Saturday. I also thought the variety of exhibitors in
the Expo hall was really good. Some of
them were of more interest to me than others, but that's as you'd expect.
But far and away the most valuable aspect of Rootstech for
me was the networking – getting to meet new people, and getting to catch up
with some of those I don't see too often.
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Day 3 Keynotes at Rootstech
The final keynote speeches of Rootstech started with David Pogue, Technology columnist from the New York Times. His presentation was fantastic. He talked about the way the technology market has been moving at a phenomenal rate. He demonstrated an iPhone app, Ocarina, which simulates the South American instrument. The app has four buttons on the screen that represent the finger holes, and to play it, you blow into the microphone.
He showed some augmented reality apps, including a subway app that recognises where your phone is pointing, and if it is pointing down to the street or footpath it shows you which subways (or underground lines) are beneath your feet, and if you point it up in front of you it shows you where to go to get to the station for each line. There was another app for the colour blind. Pointing it at an item of clothing displayed a colour name and allows the colour blind to coordinate an outfit. There is an app that allows you to point to a building and see how many people in it are tweeting. A really mind blowing app was “World Lens”. You point the phone’s camera at some writing at it instantaneously translates it into English (or whatever language you specify).
This huge trend in apps is colliding with another huge trend – web 2.0 where the audience creates the material, eg facebook, Wikipedia, Flickr, YouTube and so on. Keeping up with all the changes and innovations is like trying to drink from a fire hose.
He finished up by playing a couple of songs on the piano. These were popular songs where he had rewritten the words. The first was the “Sounds of silence” about being on a phone queue, and the second was “I want an iPhone” (to the tune of “My Way”). It was hysterical and the audience loved it and gave him a standing ovation. I was standing next to The Ancestry Insider who said “I’d hate to be the MyHeritage Speaker”
He was referring to the second keynote, Ori Soen, Chief Marketing Officer for My Heritage. He had stepped in to replace the originally scheduled speaker, who could not attend, and introduced James Tanner (from the blog Genealogy’s Star) who talked about MyHeritage, how the process of loading your family tree works, and about the record matching (to people and resources) that can occur once you have entered people into your tree.
The Ancestry Insider was right. David Pogue WAS a hard act to follow....
Keynote speakers Day 2 of Rootstech
Day two of Rootstech and there were two keynote speakers. The first was Jyl Pattee, who was talking about the “WOW!” moments in our lives. She was basically advocating a combination of Oral Histories, to capture other people’s “Wow” moments and writing down your own, so that all the memories will be captured for eternity. One really good idea she came up with is to capture the small moments when they occur in a blog. This can become the basis for a book. She entreated us not to wait til the end of the experience to record it as you won’t remember it all by then.
The second keynote speaker was Tim Sullivan, President and CEO of Ancestry.com. He stressed that collaboration is the key to building your family history. When you work with others you will achieve much more. Naturally, he was advocating doing this by putting your family tree on Ancestry and then collaborating with people who find they match your tree. He quoted one ancestry user who says that she “benefits from other people’s eyes looking at my tree and offering corrections”. It forces her to get out her research, review it and make corrections.
So collaboration is absolutely key to success. Ancestry try to create a space where beginners and experts can come together to work on their family history. Then he made a shocking revelation: the trees on Ancestry are not always 100% accurate. There are some mistakes. :) But ancestry thinks it is still worth those trees being there, as people can benefit from publishing their families and therefore getting the opportunity to correct their mistakes.
He also announced some new things that are coming to Ancestry. The ones that we were told about were US based, but the audience was very excited to hear that US Probate records will be added (a collaboration with Familysearch).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


